XXX Chats

Arba chat sex

Dating violence perpetration journal

TY - JOURT1 - Social norms and beliefs regarding sexual risk and pregnancy involvement among adolescent males treated for dating violence perpetration AU - Silverman, Jay G. Six focus groups were conducted (N = 34 participants).

The combination of peer-supported norms of male multiple partnering and adversarial sexual beliefs appear to support increased male sexual risk, lack of accountability for sexual risk, and rationalization of rape and negative responses to pregnancy.

KW - Dating violence KW - Development KW - Intergenerational transmission KW - Intimate partner violence KW - Longitudinal KW - Path analysis UR -

uses cookies to improve performance by remembering your session ID when you navigate from page to page.

The present study explored perceived sexual norms and behaviors related to sexual risk and pregnancy involvement among adolescent males (ages 13 to 20) participating in programs for perpetrators of dating violence.

The purpose of this study was to generate hypotheses regarding the contexts and mechanisms underlying the intersection of adolescent dating violence, sexual risk and pregnancy.

The combination of peer-supported norms of male multiple partnering and adversarial sexual beliefs appear to support increased male sexual risk, lack of accountability for sexual risk, and rationalization of rape and negative responses to pregnancy. AU - Raj, Anita AU - Miller, Elizabeth PY - 2006/7Y1 - 2006/7N2 - The present study explored perceived sexual norms and behaviors related to sexual risk and pregnancy involvement among adolescent males (ages 13 to 20) participating in programs for perpetrators of dating violence.

Further research focused on the context of male sexual risk and abusive relationship behaviors is needed to inform intervention with young men to promote sexual health and prevent rape, dating violence, and adolescent pregnancy. The purpose of this study was to generate hypotheses regarding the contexts and mechanisms underlying the intersection of adolescent dating violence, sexual risk and pregnancy.No evidence of indirect effects from witnessing family violence to dating aggression was found through any of the proposed mediators.Taken together, the findings suggest that anger dysregulation and normative beliefs are potential targets for dating abuse prevention efforts aimed at youth who have directly experienced violence. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other entities have made funding available to community based agencies for dating violence prevention.Yet, the evidence in this area somewhat limited, and there have been no comprehensive reviews of the literature that clearly distinguish correlates of dating violence perpetration from established risk or protective factors.Commonly used dating violence prevention programs assume that promotion of more egalitarian gender role attitudes will prevent dating violence perpetration.Empirical research examining this assumption, however, is limited and inconsistent.To guide researchers and practitioners as they formulate prevention programs, these authors review the literature on risk and protective factors for adolescent dating violence perpetration and highlight those factors for which temporal precedence has been established by one or more studies. They also propose next steps for etiological research in adolescent dating violence, as well as future directions for prevention program developers. Descriptive norms did not moderate the effect of gender role attitudes on dating violence perpetration.The results suggest that injunctive norms and gender role attitudes work synergistically to increase risk for dating violence perpetration among boys; as such, simultaneously targeting both of these constructs may be an effective prevention approach.

Comments Dating violence perpetration journal